Submitted by Admin on Thu, 02/09/2010 - 8:40am
"Let's Get Great Outcomes" (LGGO) meeting details and logistics:
- Process: The LGGO (ProCreative) meetings are focused on getting great outcomes. The format is flexible while being focused, in as much as the focus on outcomes then drives a fluid process of what, or how the meetings progress. Where appropriate, member and facilitator experience and knowledge is shared to accelerate, or fuel greater intuition, creativity, results.
Submitted by Steve Pirie on Mon, 30/08/2010 - 8:12am
Hi and welcome
As the facilitator of the "Let's get great outcomes" or maybe on a bad day, "Let's get good outcomes" 
, I believe in the power and effectiveness of these groups. In fact these style of meetings were instrumental in writing my first book Be and Become.
Thu 19 Aug, 2010
We're moving into a collaborative, fluid world, like schools of fish that change direction almost instantaneously, so too future human cultures, it appears.
Sun 15 Aug, 2010
Research that shows creativity and innovation is most effective in startup entrepreneurial companies:
Sun 15 Aug, 2010
Some time back I remember seeing this research by Martin Fiebert, California State University, and thought it helpful in revealing the bias routinely observed in the media concerning "women as victims".
From the website:
275 scholarly investigations: 214 empirical studies and 61 reviews and/or analyses, ... demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.
Sun 8 Aug, 2010
An interesting article by Fiona Smith (Sydney Morning Herald) on the reliance of people on the context and circumstances giving them 'confidence'.
Which means what is seen as 'confidence' is often surface-layer, reliant on external structures, not on internal values or personal strength -- what we might call a 'fair-weather confidence'.
From the article:
Sat 31 Jul, 2010
Interesting research confirming that small, interdependent groups, wherein everything was shared (including sex, partners, possessions) was once practiced, widespread.
Seems quite sensible. Raises the question: how much do we constrain our natural creative urges, due to religious or cultural strictures?
